A state ruled by people of good governance?????

Just look at it, what can we contemplate? That one scenario of future, and and the fate of the authority. Are we backward or forward. Is this the way one shows appreciation to a person in authority who was just a volunteer with only one intention to preserve law and order?

Is this the freedom preached by those liberalist? Is this how a civil liberties being translated? What say you Suhakam is this human? Need not the RELA personnel has his personal safety be protected? Does he has his rights too? Do these hooligans care one hoot for the uniform he is wearing?

But nothing much can be said, anything defending the authority or authorities deem to contravene the civil liberties and human rights especially in the state under the rule of leaders who preached of equality and freedom.

Do they, the so call preachers practiced what they preached? They seem to, but actually the photograph speaks for itself. Not to worry, with the classic "tai chi experts" holding the fort, the authority will still be blamed, at least the complain will be on competency or adequacy of manpower deployed. Be rest assured these "experts" are good in their investigations. Just like what the "grandmaster" concluded on the fate of TBH, even before the Judicial Inquiry concluded.

Do the Penangites appreciate this approach of good governance and the belief of civil liberties? Do Penangites want to be branded the supporters or sympathizers of a government that will resort to anything minus the moral values just for powers?

But if that's the choice of Penangite, the scenario above was just the beginning.